Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. National Museum Scotland
  4. Article
  5. Palaeogenomic Evidence for the Long-Term Reproductive Isolation Between Wild and Domestic Cats

Palaeogenomic Evidence for the Long-Term Reproductive Isolation Between Wild and Domestic Cats

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Jamieson, Alexandra
Carmagnini, Alberto
Howard-McCombe, Jo
Doherty, Sean
Hirons, Alexandra
Dimopolous, Evangelos
Lin, Audrey
Allen, Richard
Anderson-Whymark, Hugo
ORCIDORCID logo
Barnett, Ross
Batey, Colleen
Beglane, Fiona
Bowden, Will
Bratten, John
De Cupere, Bea
Drew, Ellie
Foley, Nicole
Fowler, Tom
Fox, Allison
Geigl, Eva-Maria
Gotfredsen, Anne Birgitte
Grange, Thierry
Griffiths, David
GroàŸ, Daniel
Haruda, Ashleigh
Hjermind, Jesper
Knapp, Zoe
Lebrasseur, Ophelie
Librado, Pablo
Lyons, Leslie
Mainland, Ingrid
McDonnell, Christine
Muà±oz-Fuentes, Violeta
Nowak, Carsten
O’Connor, Terry
Peters, Joris
Russo, Isa-Rita
Ryan, Hannah
Sheridan, J A
ORCIDORCID logo
S. Sinding, Mikkel-Holger
Skoglund, Pontus
Swali, Pooja
Symmons, Robert
Thomas, Gabor
Jensen, Theis Zetner Trolle
Kitchener, Andrew C
ORCIDORCID logo
Senn, Hellen
Lawson, Daniel
Driscoll, Carlos
Murphy, William
Beaumont, Mark A
Ottoni, Claudio
Sykes, Naomi
Larson, Greger
Frantz, Laurent A F
Date published
2023
Abstract
Domestic cats were derived from the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis lybica), after which they dispersed with people into Europe. As they did so, it is possible that they interbred with the indigenous population of European wildcats (Felis silvestris). Gene flow between incoming domestic animals and closely related indigenous wild species has been previously demonstrated in other taxa including pigs, sheep, goats, bees, chickens and cattle. In the case of cats, a lack of nuclear, genome-wide data, particularly from Near Eastern wildcats, has made this possibility difficult to either detect or quantify. To address these issues, we generated 75 ancient mitochondrial genomes, 14 ancient nuclear genomes and 31 modern nuclear genomes from European and Near Eastern wildcats. Our results demonstrate that despite cohabitating for at least 2,000 years on the European mainland and in Britain, most modern domestic cats possessed less than 10% of their ancestry from European wildcats, and ancient European wildcats possessed little to no ancestry from domestic cats. The antiquity and strength of this reproductive isolation between introduced domestic cats and local wildcats was likely the result of behavioural and ecological differences. Intriguingly, this long-lasting reproductive isolation is currently being eroded in parts of the species’ distribution as a result of anthropogenic activities.
Journal title
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
ISSN
1879-0445
eISSN
0960-9822
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4384594
Related URL
https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4384594
Rights statement
In Copyright
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.4384594
Keywords
cats
palaeogenomics
domestication
Additional information
This is a preprint article, it offers immediate access but has not been peer reviewed
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify