Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. National Museum Scotland
  4. Article
  5. Limited historical admixture between European wildcats and domestic cats

Limited historical admixture between European wildcats and domestic cats

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Jamieson, Alexandra
Carmagnini, Alberto
Howard-McCombe, Jo
Doherty, Sean
Hirons, Alexandra
Dimopoulos, Evangelos
Lin, Audrey T
Allen, Richard
Anderson-Whymark, Hugo
Barnett, Ross
Batey, Colleen
Beglane, Fiona
Bowden, Will
Bratten, John
De Cupere, Bea
Drew, Ellie
Foley, Nicole M
Fowler, Tom
Fox, Allison
Geigl, Eva-Maria
Gotfredsen, Anne Birgitte
Grange, Thierry
Griffiths, David
GroàŸ, Daniel
Haruda, Ashleigh
Hjermind, Jesper
Knapp, Zoe
Lebrasseur, Ophélie
Librado, Pablo
Lyons, Leslie A
Mainland, Ingrid
McDonnell, Christine
Muà±oz-Fuentes, Violeta
Nowak, Carsten
O’Connor, Terry
Peters, Joris
Russo, Isa-Rita M
Ryan, Hannah
Sheridan, J A
ORCIDORCID logo
Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S
Skoglund, Pontus
Swali, Pooja
Symmons, Robert
Thomas, Gabor
Trolle Jensen, Theis Zetner
Kitchener, Andrew C
ORCIDORCID logo
Senn, Helen
Lawson, Daniel
Driscoll, Carlos
Murphy, William J
Beaumont, Mark
Ottoni, Claudio
Sykes, Naomi
Larson, Greger
Frantz, Laurent
ORCIDORCID logo
Date published
November 2023
Abstract
Domestic cats were derived from the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis lybica), after which they dispersed with people into Europe. As they did so, it is possible that they interbred with the indigenous population of European wildcats (Felis silvestris). Gene flow between incoming domestic animals and closely related indigenous wild species has been previously demonstrated in other taxa, including pigs, sheep, goats, bees, chickens, and cattle. In the case of cats, a lack of nuclear, genome-wide data, particularly from Near Eastern wildcats, has made it difficult to either detect or quantify this possibility. To address these issues, we generated 75 ancient mitochondrial genomes, 14 ancient nuclear genomes, and 31 modern nuclear genomes from European and Near Eastern wildcats. Our results demonstrate that despite cohabitating for at least 2,000 years on the European mainland and in Britain, most modern domestic cats possessed less than 10% of their ancestry from European wildcats, and ancient European wildcats possessed little to no ancestry from domestic cats. The antiquity and strength of this reproductive isolation between introduced domestic cats and local wildcats was likely the result of behavioral and ecological differences. Intriguingly, this long-lasting reproductive isolation is currently being eroded in parts of the species’ distribution as a result of anthropogenic activities.
Journal title
Current Biology
Volume
33, ISSUE 21,
Issue
21
Publisher
Elsevier BV
ISSN
0960-9822
Date accepted
August 9, 2023
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.031
Related URL
https://www.nms.ac.uk/collections-research/collections-departments/scottish-history-and-archaeology/meet-the-team/dr-hugo-anderson-whymark/
https://www.nms.ac.uk/collections-research/collections-departments/natural-sciences/meet-the-team/dr-andrew-kitchener/
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960982223010734
https://www.nms.ac.uk/collections-research/collections-departments/scottish-history-and-archaeology/meet-the-team/
Rights statement
In Copyright
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.031
Keywords
cats
ancient DNA
hybridization
domestication
Additional information
Full text available via the official URL
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify